Upload your learning material, define the competencies you want to assess, and generate reviewable exams with unique but equivalent versions for every learner.
Which organelle is primarily responsible for ATP production in eukaryotic cells?
Compare mitosis and meiosis in a short paragraph.
In the diagram of a food web, identify the tertiary consumer.
Four recurring problems make quality assessment expensive to produce and hard to trust.
Manually writing, aligning, and formatting questions for each unit is slow, repetitive work.
One version circulated between students or cohorts quickly undermines the assessment.
Simple shuffling doesn't guarantee that two students face equivalent difficulty or coverage.
A single grade rarely shows which competencies a student has mastered and which they haven't.
Four steps from curriculum to graded results.
Bring in PDFs, Word documents, PowerPoint decks, or plain text from your course.
See what the system pulled out, edit anything, and confirm what you actually want to assess.
Draft questions in multiple formats, edit inline, and approve only what belongs in your bank.
Give each learner a unique but equivalent form, then review results by competency.
What you can actually do inside ExamForge.
Questions are drafted against the material you upload, not generic templates.
Support for MCQs and open-ended written questions in the same exam.
Every draft is editable. Approve, revise, or discard before it reaches learners.
Generate individualized forms drawn from the same competency and difficulty mix.
Objective items are scored automatically; open-ended items can be routed for review.
See mastery by topic and competency, not just an overall percentage.
Access-coded student portal with attempt tracking and autosave.
Group educators, share question banks, and manage branding at the org level.
Build unit assessments, quizzes, and mocks aligned to your syllabus.
Deliver equivalent exam forms across large cohorts and sections.
Assess practical competencies across cohorts of learners.
Verify skill uptake after internal training programs.
Author item banks and generate exam versions with human review.
What we do — and honestly, what we don't claim.
Every AI-generated question is editable and requires teacher approval before it reaches students.
Nothing is delivered to a learner until an educator has signed off on the exam.
Student and course data is scoped to your organization with row-level access rules.
The platform tracks which material and competency each question was generated from.
Automatic scoring for written answers can be configured to require a human review step.
We don't claim regulatory compliance, security certifications, or guaranteed accuracy. Human review remains part of every workflow.
Pricing is finalized during our pilot. Plans below describe scope, not confirmed prices.
Try the core workflow.
For individual teachers and trainers.
For teams and institutions.
Get from curriculum to a reviewable, individualized exam in a single afternoon.